Twitter Lists: Relevance Is In the Eye of The Beholder

Posted on November 5th, 2009 by Katie Van Domelen • No Comments »
Share
My Twitter List of people on my team. Click to see Sitewire's FULL official list.

My Twitter List of people on my team. Click to see Sitewire's FULL official list.

Now that the dust has settled on the new “Twitter Lists” feature, I’d like to share my thoughts on what this means for the Twitter community as well as any brands who use Twitter to connect with their audience.

First a refresher on lists: Twitter Lists is a new function where users can organize the people they follow into groups by type. They can name that list and make it public. When people come to your profile they can see all the public lists you have, and all the public lists you are on. These lists work similar to Facebook’s lists where you can click on a link to the list to see an update stream including only members of that group, making it easier to read updates from people you actually listen to.

Now, what Twitter Lists is going to change:

1. Help weed out the fakes

Yes, you can use some sort of spam-bot autofollow feature to drum up insane amounts of followers over short periods of time. However, if you have tens of thousands of followers, but are only on 1 list, it’ll be pretty clear to people that those followers aren’t genuinely listening to you. I think pretty soon we’ll be looking at a followers/list ratio to determine influence rather than simply follower count or a follower/following ratio.

2. Make it easier to find interesting people

Let’s say you’re a “foodie” and you follow this one guy who’s always tweeting about really great places to eat and you really like the stuff he sends out. You head over to his profile and check out his lists. There on the top is his “Best Food Critics” list. You click on that and immediately you have a list of potential people to follow vetted by someone you already respect. This same model works in any industry or category. And it can also work for brands – need to find people who are into fashion? Find one major fashion tweeter and click on their “Favorite Fashion Bloggers” list – instant contact list for you to follow or reach out to.

3. People can follow lists instead of other people

There’s a function to follow a list – all this does is add a link to that list in your profile. You don’t actually follow the individuals, so they don’t show up in your main feed all the time. But you if you want to catch up with the updates from the people on that particular list, you can easily click through. Almost like a saved search.

This will give people the ability to follow things they care about occassionally. Like if you find a “Politicians” list compiled by Time. You don’t want to follow all those people in your main feed. But you might want to pop into that list’s stream every so often to see what’s being discussed there. That way you can see what all the senators (from both sides) have to say during a televised press conference, but not have to see their updates every day.

Lists also come with an API feature. That means you can build a list and then incorporate that stream into a Web site or application. The example Twitter provided of this was the Huffington Post creating lists around the World Series: one for baseball sports writers, one for people associated with the Yankees, and one for people with the Phillies. All three lists show up on the Web site side by side and people can read what’s being discussed by people who’ve been chosen by the organization. Assuming you trust that organization to pick the right people, it’s very convenient. It’s a similar concept to the hashtag, but without the possiblity of some weirdo selling Viagra throwing the hashtag into their tweet in attempt to get seen on the real-time feed at the event (and we’ve all seen that happen…)

 

Conclusion:

As we’re seeing across the board in social networks, this is a shift towards increasing relevance for users by emphasizing people and brands who are providing the most valuable content. If you’re putting out something that people like, you’ll make it onto lists where people will find you. If you all you’re doing is tweeting out garbage, you’ll fall by the wayside, no matter how many followers you have. You can’t even count on the impression anymore, on Twitter or Facebook. Before, if you had a follower or fan and you wrote an update, they would see it. Now with all the changes in lists and updated streams – they’ll only see updates from content they deem interesting.

 

What do you think? Like lists or not? Leave me a comment. Also, don’t forget to check out our Sitewire Employee List to see what we’ve all got to say.

Bookmark and Share

Full Disclosure Conundrum: Exploring Sponsored Tweets

Posted on November 4th, 2009 by Cassandra Okamoto • 2 Comments »
Share

sponsored tweets

As of today, Twitter.com does not host traditional banner ads. Earlier this year Twitter reinforced on their blog that “traditional web banner advertising isn’t interesting to [them].” They then went on to explain that, of course, they don’t hate advertising and are leaving the door open for exploration regarding this specific idea. A few months later, on September 10th, they modified their terms of service to allow for advertising. There were no specific comments around what kind of advertising might be available but again it was emphasized they were leaving the door open.

Throughout this time the social media marketing company IZEA launched a new venture named Sponsored Tweets. Here’s how it works: Sponsored Tweets website offers a slew of celebrity tweeters including reality TV stars, movie stars, rock stars, authors, and web celebs that businesses can choose to sponsor, as well as some “staff pick” tweeters that come at a much lower cost. In reality it is the celeb doing the sponsoring, they are paid (and as can be seen on the website they don’t come cheap!) per tweet to mention a certain product and in most cases offer a link to a corresponding website, store, etc. IZEA and the Sponsored Tweets program stresses on their site they are committed to ethical behavior and their tweeters “are required to disclose their relationship with marketers”. They also showcase their Disclosure Engine whose interface forces the tweeter to choose a disclosure text phrase, i.e. my sponsor, sponsor, sponsored, ad, before they submit their tweet. This all seems like an obvious win-win situation: brilliant, well thought out idea, profit generating for both IZEA and the various featured tweeters, as well as obvious benefits for the participating businesses. But what about the tweeters on the other end, the audience for these sponsored tweets?

Below are different variations of what these sponsored tweets look like, tweeted this month from reality TV stars Holly Madison and Kim Kardashian.

tweet1

As you can see this one came directly from the Sponsered Tweets Directory Engine and features the word sponsored to start off. The one below though, came from Twitter.com via a mobile device and only features the hashtag #spon.

tweet2

As you can see these are not auto-generated advertisements. They seem to be written by the actual person tweeting them, and they add personal preferences, dialogue, etc. to them. The bottom tweet came out first on Oct 8th and when reading it, I did not even think about what #spon meant. At first glance I thought Holly Madison really went out and bought these soaps because of their green, natural, and vegan characteristics and was sharing which scent was her favorite. The second tweet on Oct 12th is as equally misleading in my opinion, although it does start with the word sponsored, it is written very personally and without clicking on the link you may not know if the word sponsored pertains just to the link or may just gloss over it all together. My biggest problem with these sponsored links is the fact they are being paid large sums of money just to send out 140 characters.

Keeping this in mind, it seems reasonable to wonder if they have even tried the product. Did the company really send Holly the soaps to try? Is that really even her favorite scent or were the terms specified for her to say that. It seems that for the amount of money being paid, the business should have 100% control of what is being written, and more than likely, she is just writing exactly what they told her to. The tweet below is regarding a movie release tweeted by Kim Kardashian. It does say SPONSORED in capital letters which is a bit more obvious than Madison’s lowercase version, but again it is not an auto-generated advertisement and speaks directly to Kim’s personal life.

tweet3

The tweet below presents an even further conflict. This tweet does not include sponsored or a link. But as Kardashian depicted on her blog days earlier, her birthday party in Vegas was actually hosted by T-Mobile and she received the CLIQ from the company that night. Was she paid to write this tweet? Or does she actually really like this phone? This tweet does not seem to have been facilitated by Sponsored Tweets, but it seems once the idea of paying active tweeting celebrities for advertising mentions was introduced, businesses could very well take it into their own hands. If she was indeed paid for this it may or may not violate Twitter terms of service or other new legal crackdowns regarding paid content and disclosure.

tweet4

Sponsored Tweets take on many forms, many speaking directly as advertisements for sales, grand openings, etc. And while these can be annoying, distracting, and a good way to lose followers, it is the personal product endorsements seen above that make me really question the idea and future of this form of Twitter advertising. For some the appeal of Twitter is that it closed the gap between every day, average (and I use that term very loosely) people and celebrities, political leaders, and the like. They could see into some aspects of these “famous” people’s everyday lives, what they were doing, what they like, what they didn’t like, what they indulge in, etc. This form of sponsored tweeting definitely impedes on that idea.

Is this a great idea for companies to get their idea out to more than just their direct followers? Another spammy gimmick? Or just plain deceiving? What do you think? Leave a comment!

1 people like this post.
Bookmark and Share

Yahoo! Search Algorithm Change – What You Need To Know

Posted on October 26th, 2009 by Leslie Jackson • No Comments »
Share

yahoo_new

Clearly Yahoo! is still “in the game” as an independent search engine. Despite the pending purchase by Bing, the folks over at Yahoo! are continuing to innovate in an attempt to attract a larger share of searches.

Late last month they unveiled their new “search experience” with the new Yahoo! Search – which looks a lot like Google. Part of this change included a new homepage, improvements to their core group of products – Yahoo! Mail, Yahoo! Messenger – and a handful of new handy dandy search features such as:

  • Intelligent Search Results – Allows you to explore results from key sites and narrow results using different types structured data. Over the past few months, even more enhanced results for product, local, entertainment, reference, social, and tech sites have been displayed automatically. With the new search page design, Yahoo! made it easier to see these rich results from an increasing number of sites.
  • Feature-Rich Experience – Provides quick access to search features that make people’s online lives safer and easier, including Search Scan/SafeSearch (which helps protect you from viruses, spyware, and spam while you search) and Search Pad (a tool that helps you track sites and information while researching).
  • Search Assist Expansion – With the new design, the query assistance is still available directly below the search box, but Yahoo! also incorporated it into the left-hand column for quick access lower on the page, even when the Search Assist layer is hidden. You can use this column to easily explore and discover concepts related to your query.

Feedback from users seems mixed between people who completely love it, to those who think the interface is too cluttered and overwhelming. The biggest change noticeable to marketers and site owners is that the change resulted in significant fluctuations in ranking results – but over time this may stabilize. We’ll continue to monitor those fluctuations for our clients and let you all know what we learn.

What do you think about the update? Share in the comments.

1 people like this post.
Bookmark and Share

Changes to the Facebook News Feed and What It Means for Your Brand

Posted on October 20th, 2009 by Katie Van Domelen • No Comments »
Share

Inside-facebook-256

Facebook is redesigning it’s news feed in an attempt to increase relevance and become a central web portal for users. Highlights:

  • Top Stories Feature: Facebook is developing an algorithm to display the most interesting posts from a user’s friends, presumably based on previous “likes” and comments.
  • Groups have gotten an overhaul. They’ll begin to look a lot more like pages and activity that a users friends do in groups that the user is a part of will be displayed in his or her feed. Group admins still can’t push updates to the whole group - for that kind of reach, a page is still optimal.
  • Virtual gifts, event RSVPs and friends who fan a page will now show up in the news feed
Major take away for brands: First, the right hand column will be less cluttered giving the homepage ad a potentially larger impact. Second, pages will have more opportunities to get impressions in fans’ and friends of fans’ news feed stream with event RSVPs, virtual gifts, and new fans all showing up there.

The more emphasis Facebook puts on the homepage and the news feed, the more it becomes a user’s main way to connect on Facebook. Users are being trained to use the news feed and rely on it for processing information about their network. Any brand that’s not regularly showing up in that feed is going to be easily lost. Facebook has added new ways to get featured there, but this underscores the importance of publishing frequently via a Facebook in order to keep a presence on fans’ news feeds.

In my opinion content creation and publishing schedules are major pieces of a successful approach to social media and Facebook in particular, and these new changes only stress that point. I use a template with all of our clients that might be helpful for getting started: Facebook Publishing Schedule Template.

Questions or thoughts? Leave a comment below.

Clients can also contact us for more information on Facebook strategy.

1 people like this post.
Bookmark and Share

Why Mobile Must Be a Part of Your Interactive Strategy

Posted on October 16th, 2009 by Greg Chapman • No Comments »
Share

Photo credit: In Veritas Lux (Flickr)

The numbers are staggering.

According to CTIA – The Wireless Association, there are 4.1 billion text messages sent every day over wireless devices. There were 740 billion text messages sent during the first half of 2009 – a 92% increase over the 385 billion messages sent during the first half of 2008. This includes more than 10 billion MMS messages, which means multimedia messages are growing at an even more accelerated pace – up 119% over 2008.

The trend in messaging alone is enough to stimulate thinking around developing a closely integrated mobile and interactive strategy. But wait…..it gets better.

The 246 million data capable devices in the hands of users today aren’t just being used for character- limited, truncated SMS messages containing smiley faces, no sirree bob…..web visitors using a mobile device increased 34 percent year-over-year, from 42.5 million mobile Web visitors in July 2008 to 56.9 million in July 2009 (according to The Nielsen Company).

Some interesting “stuff” I took notes on at the recent Shop.org gathering regarding Mobile…

  • The CEO of Macy’s looks for mobile to triple over the “next couple of years” (from his keynote)
  • Moosejaw’s “Madness Texts” drive a 54% response rate (from the mobile breakout session)
  • Mobile has fundamentally changed Fandango’s Value Prop – the user behavior is different and an analysis performed showed that the incremental increase was delivered by new customers.
  • 69% of teens – the new digital natives, research all purchases before they buy anything (Kelly Mooney’s keynote). My opinion is that practically all of this research will be done on the third screen in the very, very near future, if not already.

Juniper Research estimates that close to 3 billion mobile coupons will be issued to Mobile device users by 2011, with around $7 billion worth of discounts redeemed. That’s $7 billion. In discounts. This study finds that mobile coupons are becoming an increasingly important tool for brands to provide a key ‘push to purchase’ capability for mobile marketing and advertising campaigns.

We’re tying Mobile into our key Local/Mobile/Social/Search strategic approach. We think it will be a critical component of a well thought out, fully integrated interactive strategy over the next several years. We’re investing in the platforms and people necessary to drive it.

I’d like to hear your thoughts.

 

*Photo credit: In Veritas Lux (Flickr)

Bookmark and Share